<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
		<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='http://www.kmklaw.com/rss.xsl?1329007023'?>
		<rss version='2.0' 
			xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
			xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
		<channel>
			<title>Complex Litigation</title>     
			<link>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/</link>
			<atom:link href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
			<description></description>
			
			<item>
				<title>Strategic Defense in Criminal Antitrust Case Can Impact Civil Class Action Case Outcomes</title>
				<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/criminal-antitrust-class-action-litigation</link>
				<guid>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/81</guid>
				<dc:creator>Richard L. Creighton, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>A criminal antitrust case involving two bagged ice producers that pleaded guilty to conspiring &quot;to supress and eliminate competition&quot; was recently concludeded in U.S. District Court in Cincinnati.&nbsp; While KMK was not involved in this case, it does bring to mind a few key considerations for companies and their attorneys to weigh when faced with bet-the-company criminal and civil litigation.</p>
<p><a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/criminal-antitrust-class-action-litigation'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,antitrust'>Antitrust</a>, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,bet-the-company-litigation'>Bet-the-Company Litigation</a>, Class Action Litigation, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Class Actions Unconstitutional?</title>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/FRCP23-unconstitutional</link>
				<guid>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/60</guid>
				<dc:creator>Joseph M. Callow, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>For a more theoretical and mildly controversial read regarding class actions, follow the argument and articles (like the recent article in the February 8, 2010 issue of <em>Forbes</em>) of Northwestern University School of Law Professor Martin Redish, who is now suggesting that Rule 23 may be unconstitutional. </p>
<p><a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/FRCP23-unconstitutional'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: Class Action Litigation, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Justice Sotomayor Speaks!</title>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/justice-sotomayor-speaks</link>
				<guid>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/55</guid>
				<dc:creator>Joseph M. Callow, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p><font color="#000000">Justice Sotomayor wrote her first substantive opinion as a Supreme Court Justice, and it is a good read and a good wake up call for class action practitioners.</font></p>
<p><a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/justice-sotomayor-speaks'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: Class Action Litigation</div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>ERISA and Federal Rule 23... Point 1</title>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/class-action-litigation-Federal-Rule-23</link>
				<guid>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/31</guid>
				<dc:creator>Michael L. Scheier</dc:creator><dc:creator>David T. Bules</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p align="left">In an ERISA case pending in the Northern District of Illinois involving breach of fiduciary duty and prohibited transaction claims, the plaintiffs filed a motion asking the court to allow them to proceed in a representative capacity on behalf of the plan under ERISA section 502(a)(2) rather than require them to certify a class under Federal Rule 23.&nbsp; The District Court in Chicago denied that motion based on the defendants' opposition, and suggested that the case proceed, not as a class action under Federal Rule 23, but as a &quot;derivative action&quot; under Federal Rule 23.1.</p>
<p><a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/class-action-litigation-Federal-Rule-23'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,bet-the-company-litigation'>Bet-the-Company Litigation</a>, Class Action Litigation, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,Federal-Rule'>Federal Rule</a>, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,class-action-litigation-FedRule23'>Federal Rule 23.1</a>, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Summary of ERISA "Excessive Fees" Litigation in 15 Minutes</title>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/excessive-fees</link>
				<guid>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/30</guid>
				<dc:creator>Joseph M. Callow, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>ERISA class action litigation has become a niche practice. Originally, ERISA class actions were tag-along suits in securities cases. In recent years, plaintiffs have sought to certify ERISA class actions on a broad variety of breach of fiduciary duty claims. One such variety was the &quot;excessive fees&quot; claim — a claim that the plan sponsor and/or administrator breached its fiduciary duty to a class of plan participants by allowing unreasonable or excessive fees to be charged to the class on the investments offered through the Plan.</p>
<p><a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/excessive-fees'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: Class Action Litigation, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>You Have to Love a Great Opening Line!</title>
				<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/stock-drop-class-action</link>
				<guid>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/29</guid>
				<dc:creator>Joseph M. Callow, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>Everyone practicing in this area knows that over the past several years, hundreds of &quot;stock drop&quot; class action complaints have been filed around the country against virtually every public company and financial institution — whether they survived the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression or not. </p>
<p><a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/stock-drop-class-action'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: Class Action Litigation, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a>, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,stock-drop'>Stock Drop</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>What in the World Is Barratry and Why Do I Care?</title>
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/show-cause-barratry</link>
				<guid>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/28</guid>
				<dc:creator>Joseph M. Callow, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>&quot;Barratry&quot; dates back to&nbsp;15th Century Middle English and is defined by Mirriam Webster's Dictionary as: (1) the purchase or sale of office or preferment in church or state; (2) an unlawful act or fraudulent breach of duty by a master of a ship or by the mariners to the injury of the owner of the ship or cargo; and (3) the persistent incitement of litigation. Barratry is a common law crime in some states and a civil tort or equitable defense in others.</p>
<p><a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/show-cause-barratry'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: Class Action Litigation, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Sixth Circuit Practitioners:  The Standard Is Coming, the Standard Is Coming!</title>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/class-certification-requirements</link>
				<guid>http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/27</guid>
				<dc:creator>Joseph M. Callow, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>Over the past several years, circuit courts have started to provide more specific guidance on the countours of the &quot;rigorous&quot; analysis required by district courts in deciding whether to certify a class.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/class-certification-requirements'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: Class Action Litigation, <a href='http://class-action-litigation.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
		</channel>
		</rss>
		
