Print Bookmark

Impact Fee or Illegal Tax?

In The Drees Company, et al. v. Hamilton Township, Ohio, et al., Appeal No. 2009-11-150, currently pending before the Twelfth District Court of Appeals of Ohio, Plaintiffs — including The Drees Company, the Homebuilders Association of Greater Cincinnati, and others — are claiming that an impact fee passed in May 2007 by Hamilton Township on new construction is, in fact, an illegal tax.

Read more ...

"Massive" E-Discovery Failures Result in $8.5 Million Sanction

For anyone with a few minutes, I would highly recommend reviewing Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp., a recent decision out of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. In this case, which was originally a patent dispute, the court imposed a $8.5 million sanction against Qualcomm as a result of “massive” e-discovery failures, the fundamental root of which was “an incredible breakdown in communication.”

Read more ...

This blog is devoted to complex litigation related issues — recent decisions, relevant commentary, key discovery rulings of general import, substantive law developments, and suggestions on litigation strategies. We will discuss how to minimize exposure to complex litigation and how to manage cases if you have already been sued.

We're monitoring and reporting on developments in complex litigation to help you stay informed in this important and dynamic area of the law.

Blog Contact:  Joseph Callow, Litigation Partner
jcallow@kmklaw.com or 513.579.6419

Topics

Contributors

Subscribe to RSS

Recent Posts

Other KMK Blogs